Mt. Tom Minerals V.MTK (was Westmount Res, WTM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Mt. Tom Minerals V.MTK (was Westmount Res, WTM)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Biff who wrote (456)	8/29/1999 4:01:00 PM
From: William Jones	Read Replies (1) of 496

Hello Biff, I was doing some kitchen table calculations regarding the Tri Vue deal and the numbers are quite fantastic. My assumptions are: the 50,000 South American hotel rooms will obviously be rented to people who wish the gaming feature, meaning to me they are likely to actively play. Assume US $50 per room per day is $2,500,000 per day x 365 = $912,500,000 handle per year. Assume MTK/Tri-Vue received 5% admin/handling fee, $45,625,000 divide by 6,000,000 shares = $7.60 per share in annual revenue [ pre expenses ] on this deal. Multiply by 2 if they secure the other 50,000 rooms. Looks good even with 2%. Hmmmm! What am I missing? Good Fortunes, willyum

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next