SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 92.35-0.4%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan3 who wrote (28118)8/30/1999 4:56:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
Chris Boynton is obviously part of the anti-Rambus coalition, which is why I consider his comments to be highly subjective. What hinted me was the blurb on SLDRAM, a technology that used to be the unofficial "Anything But Rambus" DRAM technology. Then SLDRAM support was dropped, and the anti-Rambus people are now rallying around DDR SDRAM. And in the ZDNet article, Mr. Boynton himself is recommending DDR SDRAM! Coincidence?

Mr Boynton said, "Double-data-rate SDRAM with a 133MHz memory bus would be a far better solution at the moment. I only hope Intel stops foisting RDRAM on us before we can benefit from it, and supports DSDRAM as soon as possible."

As usual, we don't hear any reasons why DDR SDRAM is considered "a far better solution at the moment." Yet we do hear the regular "Intel is a monopoly" rhetoric that anti-Rambus people are fond of spreading. Can this guy be any more overt?

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext