SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Process Boy who wrote (70570)9/1/1999 9:34:00 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (2) of 1574384
 
PB, <I didn't consider a .05 voltage increase something even worth considering, since the competition was raising theirs an order of magnitude higher in comparison. I stand corrected, and still say big deal.>

Here we go again and again!
You are a real stubborn, PB. I don't believe
a reasonable honest person can skip evidences
like own Intel publications.
With a reference to the original Intel publication
I have shown to the thread in
Message 11078238
that the Intel 0.25 process was designed for
1.8V but did not meet performance target, so
Intel has to jack up the voltage upfront to
2.0V, and now to 2.05V.

I will take my time and show you (in case
you are not familiar with fractions and
inequalities) that 0.25/1.8= 13.9% is bigger
than 0.2/2.2=9.1%. Do I make it clear now,
or do you still believe that it is true that
"the competition was raising theirs an order of magnitude higher in comparison."

I am sure you will not respond to this post :)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News