Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Charles R who wrote (70692)	9/2/1999 10:42:00 AM
From: grok	Read Replies (2) of 1573591

RE: <Would creating a new RMBS thread make sense?> Yes, that would be great. I'd love to have someplace that you could figure out what's going on without having to wade through all the cheerleading. Unclewest has determined that IDF is great for Rambus because ... Intel endorsed Rambus! I read everything I could find on IDF last night but it is still not clear to me what Intel's support for PC133 will be. Will they spin Camino for direct PC133 support? If the drdram situation is so bad, in price and volume, that they have to do this then isn't the solution going to be too late? What happens to Coppermine until then? There is so much noise over Rambus but so little real information.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next