Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mark Bartlett who wrote (3616)	9/2/1999 5:52:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (2) of 4504

<<I hope they extend the drilling on the oxide gold cap soon, on TG1 - seems there is decent promise there and the more that is "easy picking", >> You can bet that this is one of MAN's top priority. The resource now stands at some 1.7M+ ounces of gold equivalent and, IMO, is the key to a positive feasibility on TG-1. IT will pay for a lot more than the relocation of the town and the diversion of the river. If this resource can grow to 3M ounces or so, I would not be surprised to see positive feasibility on this deposit way before we see it on the TG-1 sulphides. So the only problem seems to be the willingness of the people of Tambo Grande to be relocated. I got some comments from a contact in Peru and MAN is simply doing everything right to please the locals and facilitate coming negotiations. I think all this is extremely positive.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next