SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : TLM.TSE Talisman Energy

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Edward M. Zettlemoyer who wrote (432)9/3/1999 3:19:00 PM
From: Douglas V. Fant  Read Replies (1) of 1713
 
Ed, Heh-heh, You'll like this one....

2110 GMT, 990902 ? The U.S. and Sudan Move To Mend Ties

Mutual invitations for visits between top-level U.S. and Sudanese officials this week
indicate a warming of relations between Khartoum and Washington, giving the U.S.
more strategic options in sub Saharan Africa. These developments come on the
heels an IMF announcement earlier this week that financial sanctions had been
lifted. And, this week, oil has begun to flow from southern Sudanese wells.

AFP reported that during a recent trip to Nairobi, where U.S. Charge d'Affaires to
Sudan Donald Teitelbaum is stationed, Sudanese Foreign Minister Mustafa
Osman Ismail invited Teitelbaum to visit Khartoum later this month. In addition, the
pro-government Sudanese newspaper, Alwan, stated the U.S. had agreed to a
Washington visit by Sudan's Tokyo-based envoy Khidir Haroun.

The offer comes after Khartoum turned down a Teitelbaum request to visit the
country last month, apparently because it would have coincided with the first
anniversary of the U.S. air strike on a pharmaceuticals plant there.

There is a growing rapprochement between the U.S. and Sudan. It all began with
the July 13 announcement that President Clinton was to appoint a special envoy to
the Sudan conflict. Sudan responded with cautious optimism to the proposal.

Sudan is still on the hotlist of countries supporting terrorism and a guerrilla army.
And rebels previously supported by the U.S. are still battling the government.
Coincidentally, as overtures to Khartoum increased, U.S. support for the rebels
decreased.

A warmer U.S. stance toward Sudan explains the frantic motions by Sudanese
rebel groups to make peace with the government. These groups have received
support from the U.S. in the past. Besides, U.S. rapprochement with Khartoum is
evidence this U.S. support has dried up.

Strategically, mending ties with Sudan also fits nicely into the U.S. strategy of
isolating the many African conflicts. The conflict in southern Sudan links the hot war
between Ethiopia and Eritrea with the simmering Democratic Republic of Congo
conflict.

For what it is worth, the area of Sudan between the other major African conflicts is
also oil country. Increased U.S. support for the government and decreased support
for the rebels portend a stabilization of oil exports. At the other end of the pipeline,
it also gives the U.S. greater strategic influence over the shipping lanes in the Red
Sea. Since the Somalia debacle, U.S. littoral influence on the Red Sea has been a
strategic weak spot.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext