Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: dale w ruckle who wrote (3652)	9/5/1999 5:14:00 AM
From: Jeff Dickson	Read Replies (1) of 4504

by the way, you missed the next sentence in that quote you made of my post. The paragraph read: "As has been discussed here recently, Manhattan is not in the need of any financings in the near future. If a deal they couldn't refuse came along, then I wouldn't hold them against them if they took it. But that is not the purpose of the visit." I still believe the purpose of the trip to Peru was not explicitly financing, at least that is what my understanding was and is, and I never represented it as anything different. I have enough problems getting my words straight as it is without someone twisting them around on me. Are you a shareholder now, or still here for the entertainment value? Message 10284465 Live and let live, indeed. -jeff

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next