SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs
SPY 652.56-1.5%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Clint E. who wrote (23436)9/5/1999 2:26:00 PM
From: d. alexander  Read Replies (2) of 68154
 
>>>I read those rules today and thought they were good.

Terrific; & thanks for posting. Also, the reference to President Roosevelt in #39 (roughly-don't let your liberal convictions cloud your market judgement) indicates they may have been written 55 or more years ago! The mm's were after stops then too <g>

My favorites (meaning the ones I should keep on top of my list) #4, 14, 40, 41, 47, 49, 50. Nos. 33 & 36 are new & glad to have them. (Patience is not my forte, but am working on it. So i don't mention those involving exercise of patience.)

I think you can develop a trading system around these earnings-less or low-float/volume stocks as long as you don't watch them tick by tick

Precisely, I do watch them tick by tick. So, I have to tweak that. And the approach outlined sounds good. Thank you. As someone posted recently - you are a wonderful teacher. Have never traded that way & would like to give it a try.

Also, examples from the recent past are very good to get. Like, here it was & you might have done this or that.

EFNT, specifically, I can't quite untangle.

It went public July 15; tripled 1st day then settled back & range traded, as you mention from Aug 4 to 24

The stock was trading between 35-41 for weeks with ~200k-300k average daily volume.

Oh, wait, I'm beginning to get that part of it. Yes,

if you had entered a limit buy GTC order @ 36 and once filled, a limit sell order @ 39, you would have made ~10% in the stock while the stock was range-bound.

Absolutely. The part that's confusing me is the parenthetical

(stop at 34, below recent spike-low)...

because the spike-low to 40.625 was 4 sessions ago, & how could that affect choices made earlier in August? Well, obviously, it doesn't, but there's some short-hand connection in your mind after the fact that isn't apparent.

Likewise,

in anticipation of breakout, you could have also left a limit buy-stop order at 43...

and done very well as it soared to 65 with limit-sells in place (that 2nd day 8/26, incidentally is exactly what i thot was happening to CCRD Thursday! famous last), but how does that connect with

the recent spike-high?

now, case-study ongoing. I might suspect another breakout, but it isn't exactly range-trading. A limit-buy at 52 might be a way to go, but i would probably just alarm the volume & Friday's high (purely hypothetical) & act in the event. It also has a small gap to (probably) fill because it wasn't breakaway on Friday.

Sorry this is so long!

I haven't read Nicholas Darvas "How I Made $2M.." Amazon doesn't have it, even in willing to search for out-of-print. Will do some further checking. I ordered the other one you mentioned, also 500 pages of Adam Smith.

Dorothy
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext