SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: C.K. Houston who wrote (8510)9/6/1999 12:34:00 PM
From: C.K. Houston  Read Replies (3) of 9818
 
SEPTEMBER 9, 1999: I posted this elsewhere, but thought it was also appropriate for this thread ...

Doug,

<On CNN today more bug dates.... This new one mentioned I'am confused on how it can be a problem ... 9-9-99 date>

Personally, I don't anticipate any major, earth-shattering problems. But, I could be wrong. There's been a lot of debate, misinformation and confusion about this issue. I'm sure, with most large, older systems, if there was a problem with 9999, most of the problems have already been addressed and remediated. This trigger date has been known about for some time. I don't believe 9999 was used with embedded systems & process control.

But, when you look at some of these "contingency planning and emergency scenario" drills, ALL scheduled for September 9 ... you gotta wonder:

- Sept. 9 also will mark the first test of a $40 million-dollar U.S. inter-agency Y2K center meant to give U.S. decision makers a round- the-clock view of Y2K problems in their areas of responsibility

- On Sept. 8 and 9, the North American Electric Reliability Council ... will rehearse an emergency scenario to test operating, communications and contingency responses for the Y2K transition ...

- The U.N.-backed International Y2K Cooperation Center ... is using Sept. 9 to rehearse a plan aimed at keeping up-to-the-minute tabs on how the world is faring as it enters 2000 ...
greenspun.com

============================================================

RE: Electric Industry North American-wide Y2k Readiness Drill Sept 8-9.
Come September 10, I expect we'll see media coverage:
- "Successful Y2K Nationwide Electric Utility Test"
- "Lights will stay on in 2000" ... blah blah

However, this drill is NOT a test to ensure that electricity will work during/after Jan 1 roll-over. End-to-end testing won't be done UNTIL Dec 31 - Jan 1 ... in "real time".

September 8-9 is a "drill" to make sure "procedures" are in place FOR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS during Jan 1 roll-over.

NERC now uses the term "Y2K Ready" instead of "Y2K Compliant" to rate the members within NERC. "Y2K Ready" is a rather ambiguous term. It can mean, "Yes we have remediated and should be complete by year-end." Or, it can mean, "Yes, we have been remediating. No, we don't think we'll be done by year-end. But, we're "ready" because we have contingency plans in place." [This, according to NERC.]
Message 11128414

This "Y2K Ready" rating bothers me more than the 9999 date problem.

Cheryl
116 Days until 2000
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext