SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 86.93-0.3%9:41 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pompsander who wrote (29015)9/8/1999 7:24:00 PM
From: Jdaasoc  Read Replies (3) of 93625
 
pomp:
Yesterday, we got news of Compaq doing the next Alpha with 4 RDRAM channels. I had talked to API people at length at PCEXPO in NYC and they at that time frame were laying out a progression of memory support of: SDRAM, PC133, DDR then maybe RDRAM. They made it perfectly clear that RDRAM was there LAST choice ie any other RAM but RDRAM.
Doesn't it seem funny that all it took to revise that progression was the appearance of several hundred thousand RDRAM for development work on i820 and several million production RDRAM being produced in 4Q. I think that RDRAM's rapid implimentation has put slight dampening effect on other advanced RAM systems such as DDR. I do not see the same follow through to release of the previously announced DDR based solutions with the exception of the Reliance server chipsets.
IBM had the same progression for memory support for the PowerPC microprocessor: SDRAM, PC133, DDR and then RDRAM. I could see IBM seeing the handwriting on wall and pass up the two short lived memory systems PC133 and DDR and go directly to RDRAM shortly.

john
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext