Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Process Boy who wrote (71363)	9/8/1999 11:54:00 PM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (2) of 1573941

PB, <<If you look at the amount of resources that went into Merced and what it has cost Intel w.r.t. x86 roadmap, looks like some one was dreaming otherwise. There was a Dilbert piece yesterday with Dilbert wondering about the winners of "management vs. reality" contest. Sounded like the IA-64 story to me.> You are certainly entitled to your opinion. However, I do not agree with your assessment.> Yup, we are all entitled to our opinions. You got my agreement on that one but nevertheless I am shocked to see that you disagree with mine ;-) Just to help me pull myself out of that shock, could you share yours? Why do you think Intel fell behind so badly on x86 architecture. No new core for about 6 years now and you don't but that it is because Intel got distracted with IA64 - so, what, prey, is the reason? What is your take on that? Chuck

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next