Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (71477)	9/9/1999 10:19:00 AM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (1) of 1575121

<If no one builds a 64 bit x86 OS, AMD could really be BOXED IN as regards a future processor roadmap. Did this ever occur to you ?> If, if, if....keep hoping. Ah, the problem with backing a technology laggard! AMD does not need any 64 bits (x86 or anything else) before the end of 2000. The Athlon is sufficient to take huge market share at the volume high-end space. Thank you. On the other hand, if Intel doesn't get Wilamette and 0.13 out by next Christmas, Merced isn't going to make up for the revenues (or profits), does that occur to you? (Hint: this "if" is not in Intel's favor)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next