SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Truth about Waco

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: gao seng who wrote (850)9/11/1999 5:31:00 PM
From: Merritt  Read Replies (2) of 1449
 
Gao:

<<"There is a feeling that one should go back and re-evaluate ... The focus at the time was not whether the FBI was doing the shooting," Peerwani tells the paper.

Peerwani's current focus is on the 23 Davidians who had gun shot wounds.

While his office originally did some ballistics tests -- which were handed over to the FBI never to be seen again despite requests from Texas law enforcement -- Peerwani now wants to know whether bullets went through an "intermediary target, like a wall or door, before striking the people."
>> Bold type added.

I've felt that one of the stranger things about the Waco "investigation" was my never having heard of any ballistics reports. It seemed incredible to me that none were done, so I unfortunately assumed they had, but provided no data of importance...I mean, wouldn't the lawyers suing on behalf of the survivors and families looked into that first thing?

Now that there's some heat being generated, there may be more "Dr. Peerwani's" coming forward...whether from a guilty conscience, or a fear of getting nailed, or maybe just that they've had these questions in their mind that need answering. Whatever the reason, let's hope people start coming out with whatever information/questions they have.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext