Discuss Year 2000 Issues Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: bearcub who wrote (8647)	9/12/1999 8:47:00 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 9818

Bearcub, I though you and I had some history and we understood our differences. I haven't changed my stripes and taken up an "ignorance is bliss perspective." I still think anything from a 2 to an 8 or even more is possible as I've said several times before. And I've argued before that the greatest risk of all is panic. This is not a new revelation. I'll even cite you my little essay from August 21. beta.siliconinvestor.com I am neither cavalier nor hard hearted. I simply believe that at this point in time the least damage will be done by advising people to follow the official recommendation to prepare for a snowstorm, earthquake, or hurricane and not to panic. I respect your beliefs about what will happen and the strength of those beliefs. What troubles me is this kind of talk: "when there were ALL ALONG!!!!- LIFE SAVING choices available to the uninformed/unprepared, from those self-sam, sanctimonious harlots and johns who willfully kept others ignorant by their lack of personal or community sense of leadership." That's all water over the dam. The question is what is to be done now, 100 days prior to the event. For the third time I challenge you or anyone else who still thinks the alarm should be officially sounded to either propose a responsible approach to doing so or give it up. This is a quote from my second post about this. >>Who in the Federal government would you have communicate with the people, in what forum, and what would be the message? Since they and we have such poor information about what will happen, which "truth" would you have them communicate? What would you have them do that they're not doing? Would you have them do it even if they don't have the authority to do so? Would you have them do it even if there's no national consensus to do so?<>< Karen >

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next