Thank you for answering Dan's numbers with numbers of an irrelevant company with no patent pending and no clinical research submitted. Oh, I know, it is the SAME, as far as you can tell. OK, then.
Typical immature baiting by shorts: why cannot you avoid this tone?<<Are you motivated to overrepresent one side of the story by greed or stupidity? Ma>> How about answering "knowledge about a company and its products based on good, complete and thorough research." By the way, you never answered my post regarding the specifics of the machinery. If you would like, I will pull it out, but basically you were going to tell me why GUMM's machinery , based on your intimate knowledge of same, could not put out the labelling, etc.(since you brought up these factors) then I promised to answer your claims based on my actual examination of same said machinery.
Regards,
Howard
|
