SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (729)9/17/1999 3:18:00 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Read Replies (2) of 69300
 
Lather.Rinse.Repeat.: I AM NOT A CREATION SCIENTIST.
Surprise surprise!
Got ya, didn't I? gg

I do not know exactly what Creationism is or who is a creation scientist.

I have only read about them very very superficially
because the wording itself does not make sense to me.

Creation is not based on Science as I understand it.

You don't go in the lab and look under the microscope
to find God. You can't measure Him or test Him with an apparatus.

Belief in Creation ( for me ) is based purely on Faith.

Meaning I simply believe.

I can't prove it to you scientifically. I can
perhaps use the magnificence of science &
nature as highly suggestive of a Higher Design
but I can't prove it to you in the lab.

So I have eskewed Creationism, if Creationism means
proving Creation though Science. You can't do it.

But there is no question in my mind that the Carl &
the gravediggers are fierce atheists and are out
there trying to shove that philosophy ( ie that
we came fron slime ,down our throats.
that, I am definitely against

TA

Message #729 from Lather.Rinse.Repeat. at Sep 17 1999 2:18PM

>TP the whole issue in Kansas is about a couple of evolutionary grave diggers wanting to affirm their
religious views ie that we originated from slime:<

I emphatically disagree. Carl Sagan is voicing an opinion, not pronouncing doctrine. Same for the rest of your abbreviated Hall of Shame. Always
remember that the core of good science is "We invite you to disprove it". But rhetoric is not the way to do it.

And show me one single (or married, that's okay too, <gg>) Creation Scientist who'll sit still for a deconstruction of his basic premises.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News