SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company
QCOM 174.01-0.3%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MileHigh who wrote (1647)9/18/1999 12:23:00 AM
From: John Inine  Read Replies (2) of 13582
 
I'm not a chip design engineer, but here is my 2cents.

I think it may happen someday, but right now the functions of a full fledged Pentium class CPU and CDMA ASIC are sufficiently different that it makes sense to keep them separate.
Because: (IMHO)

Right now the architecture of these devices is uncertain. Usually this high level of integration happens when the product is more mature.

The chip size would be pretty big, high cost.

It would probably be a major IPR headache.

Lots of software issues, who's instruction set runs what,
are there conflicts.

I think we'll see more computing power added to the CDMA ASIC before we see the CDMA functions move to the CPU.

I hope this helps, and your question is not dumb.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext