Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Process Boy who wrote (72208)	9/18/1999 2:55:00 PM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (1) of 1572635

PB, <I do not believe AMD is ahead in the MHz department. Think about it. 650's are rare as hen's teeth. They may have a smattering of 700 systems for sale in Oct. > Just curious, what is your bemchmark when you will say AMD is ahead in MHz department? And, how do you define "smattering"? Could you be specific in your reply? <I view AMD's "releases" as very dubious, and do not anywhere meet the criteria for bin split and volume that Intel does.> Agree with the dubious part but I don't understand how you can make a statement about bin splits and volumes. Volumes will be lower for AMD and bin splits - I doubt if you know. (I say that because your comments about bin splits stick out like a sore thumb compared to the other data points I have on that issue - suggesting to me that you may be mis-informed) <If there are a slug of Tier One OEM announcements supporting K7, I will be more concerned. If upcoming announcements are limited to select retail chains in Europe offering systems, AMD has a long way to go. IMO.> Here we are in complete agreement. Chuck

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next