SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: george eberting who wrote (1882)9/19/1999 10:05:00 AM
From: Noneyet   of 2891
 
George,

Speaking about being in business, I am trying to learn more with those mail order classes, here's what I have come up with so far, now pay attention.

fcm's annual sales for their fiscal year ending June 30, 1999, were 10,631,000 US dollars. Out of that figure, usat accounted for 8,079,560 US dollars. We deduct the $ 367,000 reuters order, referenced below.

ftel.com

Then we deduct the Nato network, referenced below $ 100,000 per month x 12 months = 1,000,000.

ftel.com

We come up with a balance of $ 1,184,440 US dollars from all the rest of fcm's customers INTERNET & PRODUCTS. Now we know that usat is a very troubled company, reference below

Message 10996895

They have no money, owe alot of same to fcm, are still under a continuing SEC investigation, and have numerous shareholder lawsuits. More importantly is the fact that fcm is showing this huge accounts receivable in this past quarter and did not show any as of last quarter. usat owes fcm 92% of fcm's accounts receivable, how will they pay fcm with that $141,533 US dollars they have in cash ???

How will usat pay for those 1000 breezes they ordered on June 18,1999, that fcm said would be ready in September and now will not be ready until the end of the year according to fcm's latest press release ??

fcm started the Mar-June quarter with a $ 2,600,000 backlog and ironically usat did not pay for $2,400,000 of whatever they purchased, because fcm had no accounts receivable prior to this quarter ? Do you think there could be PROBLEM IN SHANGRI-LA ??

We addressed the BS buyout rumors, we addressed the failure of fnet to IPO, we addressed revenues, which are not looking too good when the usat portion is removed, we should have also addressed that fcm "HAS NOT" reported any backlog, nothing, nada, not one penny.....

We will look at some more info with the help of those mail order financing courses later...........
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext