However, my moral guidelines are very clear as where they emanate from.
Which are?
I know, because of the moral guide I use, that the man in Ft Worth was at the very least deranged, and did not act out of love.
...Love worketh no ill to his neighbour...
...Love does not delight in evil....
...a tree is recognized by its fruit...
What I am trying too understand about your worldview is that you are defining love by what you "feel" inside. If we all go by that, then you have to respect whatever this guy in Ft Worth was thinking as much as your own thoughts. Who is to say your rationale is any better than his, if we use our "feelings" as moral authority?
That type thought used is the same used by those that continually blame all christians for every action of Hitler, the crusades, etc etc, because he "claimed he was a christian" or such. IF SO, the moral guideline I use says... ""WHERES THE FRUIT?""
I can claim I am an astronaut too, but that don't put me on the moon.
I read that Constantine made christianity the state religion......let me ask you.....did that make every one in the Roman empire christians?
Perfectly good example is the KKK you used. Because they may say they are a "chosen" race or whatever, does that make it so?? Does that make anyone inferior? According to my guide, which says ""Love your neighbor as yourself"" and makes no distinction as to limiting who your neighbor is, then I say no , no man is inferior.
:::Notice I did not say practice, I said man.:::
(just for future reference)
dan |
