SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cirruslvr who wrote (72712)9/22/1999 12:44:00 AM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (2) of 1574272
 
Re: RAMBUS is more compelling with higher speeds."

PC133 is being shipped now at CAS 2 by Infineon and Micron at least - where it fills a cache line faster than fastest bin split 40ns Rambus 800 when the rambus is still active from the last memory request.

And it's available in volume - no testing problems, no binsplits with 3 part numbers for PC800 depending on how the parts test out.

There is really no point to rambus unless and until they get the latency down. Its performance handicap will become worse as CPU speeds go up, not better. And it faces DDR 200 and 266 in Q1. Micron is shipping DDR 333 for graphics use now.

Dan
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext