CGI Group (GIB.A) - Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CGI Group (GIB.A) -

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jean-Robert Grenier who wrote (1389)	9/22/1999 10:28:00 AM
From: The Coz	Read Replies (2) of 1673

The e-comm. They DON'T have a strong e-comm division. We're approaching a new millennium where e-comm will be a huge business and CGI want's to be there. Business-to-business e-comm for the financial and insurance industries. That's system integration and business solutions for those two industries. How do you think CGI will pay for that? CGI currency! That will increase BCE % in CGI and at the same time continue to control BCE Emergis. They did not buy it before cause IFM was in the red, it needed to secure important contracts, streamline its operations (ie move away from the Business-to-consumer services). Consolidating it in BCE hardly affected BCE's EPS. But in CGI it would have. It's very strategic. But it will not happen now! I believe it will sometime in the year 2001. 1999-2000 will be the time for the BIG acquisition in the US. I still believe that. Plus if you think about it, why is IFM the ONLY IT company held Directly by BCE instead of CGI? They're in the IT service business! And answer this: If you were Monty, what would BCE gain by keeping IFM separate?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next