SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (73052)9/25/1999 1:10:00 AM
From: grok  Read Replies (4) of 1575803
 
RE: "<Samsung lists 256M byte RIMMS as validated, I presume with 16 chips. The max memory situation is the same with either 2 or 3 slots. What am I missing?> You must mean the double-sided RIMMs, where 16 chips are placed on both sides of the module. I've heard about them, but I didn't really try and confirm their existence. Perhaps there isn't very many of those double-sided RIMMs around. And that's quite a shortage, considering the lack of even single-sided RIMMs out there. I'm sure we'll find out more this Monday. Tenchusatsu"

If you go here: usa.samsungsemi.com
you can see "Validated by Intel" in the comment field for 128MByte RIMM but not for 192 or 256MByte. I believe that double sided RIMMs require Rdrams with "mirror image" package footprint so that match pin-for-pin with the chip on the other side with vias going right through the RIMM. This may delay availability and validation.

I had heard somewhere that more than 8 Rdrams on a RIMM doesn't work but I cannot remember where I heard it. But, at least, it looks like they're not validated. So if you have to use 128MByte RIMMs then it looks like you've got either 384MBytes Max mem with 3 slots or 256MByte max mem if the 3rd slot doesn't work.

I think that Dell was trying to get 384MB to work and failed. Maybe all this mess got Michael Dell to realize that even if all the problems are solved he can't put more than 512MB on Camino and he blew his stack at his engineers. They immediately pointed their fingers at Intel. Someone finally leaked it to the press. The press got all confused and reported that more then 512MB cannot be used due to 3rd slot no good.

Maybe Monday we'll see Intel trying to announce product with 256MB max mem. Then we'll see if any OEMs are willing to ship it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext