Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (3738)	9/25/1999 12:54:00 PM
From: Sailfish	Read Replies (2) of 4504

Hi agn Bruce... Thanks for you reply... We could assume that each of the holes on TG-6 and TG-7 were approximately 500 meters deep... Being as no VMS deposits were reported, would there be an explanation as to the high mag readings for these two anomalies..?? I too, wonder why they do not now move on to TG-4 from TG-6 at the present time... Re TG-7...It is my understanding there are three separate targets(anomalies) at that location and I am wondering which one they targeted first... It is my opinion they would be better advised to move on to another target on TG-7 rather than expend additional funds at this point in time on the two holes they have already sunk...(Same reasoning for the four holes on TG-6).. I noted the Press Release did not identify where each of the four drills were located...I believe there is at least one drill remaining on TG-3??? Any thoughts or opinions you may have with regards to these situations would be greatly appreciated... Tks agn... Regards....Ray

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next