Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 163.32

+2.3%

Nov 21 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim Lurgio who wrote (42545)	9/26/1999 6:56:00 PM
From: Clarksterh	Read Replies (2) of 152472

Jim - You might be right but my question is then why have all the Japanese licensed with IDC for GSM ? I don't know. How much are they paying? Darrell made a reference to the fact that there is another set of IDC patents for GSM. Those I haven't seen. Maybe those were the ones licensed? If they are of the same calliber(sp) as the 089 patent and I were the Japanese, I might pay just because it has some merit (unlike the GTE patent that is being used against the Q), and it would almost certainly be cheaper than fighting it (assuming, as appears to be the case based on the NOK settlement, the royalty amount is pretty low on a percentage basis?). ??? Clark

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next