Amati investors Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Amati investors

AMTX 1.645

-0.3%

Nov 25 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pat mudge who wrote (13528)	4/6/1997 10:54:00 PM
From: srvhap	of 31386

"Contrary to what some think, DMT is not easy to replicate without using Amati's technology. Alcatel's discovered this as has Orckit. So has Aware." Pat what do you mean by this, all of the above are signing agreements and selling (in the case of Orckit) product. I don't understand why you say DMT is not easy to replicate. Granted it's not like making castles in the sand, but there are companies that are moving forward without Amati's help. Also, I still have not seen anything that directly ties ALA/AMTX (lot's of folks work in close proximity and never share revenues). Once again I think we need to stand back and really consider what it means to license Amati's DMT. How much will it cost anyone, and what will it really mean to the bottom line. It's really begining to look like companies are moving forward without Amati, and if Amati choses to take these companies to court it will not be good for Amati (costly/time consuming) and in the end what does it mean to the bottom line if companies must pay a fair price for being standard complient?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next