Amati investors Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Amati investors

AMTX 1.645

-0.3%

Nov 25 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: srvhap who wrote (13546)	4/7/1997 12:44:00 AM
From: j rector	of 31386

[DMT complexity] based on limited knowledge about DMT, but a reasonable background in signal processing, this is my take on the 'DMT' wars: 1) AMTX has a standard which must be adhered to if an ANSI/ETSI compliant product is to be developed. 2) AMTX will not make alot of money on licensing DMT, they wouldnt have obtained the standard if they did. 3) DMT is elegant and relatively trivial in conception, but the devil is in the details. Based on what I know about AWRE, they are nowhere near as technically advanced as AMTX in DMT xDSL. That doesnt mean that they're not capable or that they won't make money. I think that USRX and PAIR have severely underestimated the technology required to make a good DMT ADSL product. I don't think they can get competitive technology from AWRE. 4) We'll see how things shake out when/if the $%#@ chips become available. Pat did RC say when CG was going to be delivered to AMTX? Are they sweating it right now? I would be.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next