VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rich Wolf who wrote (14879)	9/28/1999 8:12:00 AM
From: kolo55	Read Replies (3) of 27311

Short interest didn't rise much. I can think of two explanations: 1. CC shorted additional shares in the period, offset by some naked short covering. From the tape action, we have had a large seller whom I presumed was CC. If this is true, then naked shorts did cover significantly on the drop in price below 5. 2. CC did not short additional shares... If CC did not short additional shares in this period, and they didn't short many (if any)last period, then the big seller(s) must be longs. I believe only one institution had enough shares to sell this many, Dimensional Analysis. These guys are the ultimate computer driven hedging operation. I still lean toward option 1. Drat those slippery naked shorts. They managed to cover a bunch when the stock dropped below 5. Paul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next