Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 159.42

-1.2%

Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: qdog who wrote (42886)	10/1/1999 12:19:00 AM
From: cfoe	Read Replies (2) of 152472

<<you mean the same Ebbers that doesn't know how to response to a major outage>> I am in no position to justify or defend WCOM's handling of the outage, or to compare it to the one that hit T in terms of complexity, etc. I just happen to think that as an entrepreneurial force, Ebbers has it over Armstrong. Paying huge sums for the cable companies which you acknowledge have historically lousy customer service and require huge sums to upgrade equipment looks to me like a mistake. Time will tell. Maybe GSM/TDMA will be sufficient for them to compete with the CDMA-based carriers for a number of years. And maybe not. I would have to rely on those on the thread with more technical expertise to argue the point. However, if CDMA is the better technology (for future wireless appliances, etc.), then not making the move because of the investment tied up in their existing system, or because they need that money to upgrade their cable investments, looks very shortsighted.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next