SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Process Boy who wrote (73592)10/1/1999 12:35:00 AM
From: dumbmoney  Read Replies (3) of 1573910
 
Cirrus and all. Intel designed the i810e to be a Mainstream platform, intended to be shipped with PIII's as well as Celeron. Coppermine is a PIII.

Yes, i820 would be better for the very high end, but strongly suggest that Coppermine's intended target has not changed that much as far as the i810e is concerned.


It's very clear that Camino was supposed to replace the current mainstream chipset, the BX. The 810 certainly can't be considered a replacement or successor to the BX, since it is a low-end integrated chipset with no AGP port.

The great mystery is how Intel managed to paint themselves into a corner with Camino/Rambus. It wasn't easy - they had to work hard to put themselves in such a bad spot.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext