Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 170.90

-1.3%

Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: cfoe who wrote (42997)	10/1/1999 12:54:00 AM
From: qdog	Read Replies (1) of 152472

I am in no position to justify or defend WCOM's handling of the outage, or to compare it to the one that hit T in terms of complexity, etc. I am. This will over a period of time errode Ebbers ability to convince Wall Street. The comparision of the two outages are real similar. Both being Frame Relay outages, for similar reasons. One being Cisco ewuipment (T) and Lu (WCOM). T reaction was to ditch the upgrade immediately and WCOM was to wait 8 days to ditch the upgrade. The huge difference was the proactive response of the two companies to paying customers. Sorry to say, but Ebbers looses customers to competition, which is Qwest, level Three, Williams and T. I know customers of WCOM that will NOT renew or are loooking to change contracts.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next