Ultra Petroleum (UPL) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Ultra Petroleum (UPL)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Traveling Man who wrote (4436)	10/3/1999 3:36:00 PM
From: Gerald Atwater	Read Replies (1) of 4851

TM -- << . . . it seems like the "payback" should be done on most of those Jonah wells . . .>> That's what I thought, too. When I asked the question I was told something to the effect that the Jonah wells weren't a priority now, that the Anticline area was. In other words, I never got an answer. From my fuzzy recollection, however, it seems to be that NONE of the Jonah wells EVER flowed into a sales line at anything approaching IP figures. (That fact has been discussed here on the thread in the past.) So after the "super-harmonic decline curve" (term used in the June, l998 company brochure) of the first few years, what remained? That's an answer all of us would like to know! Gerry

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next