This isn't the only thread on SI that I post to, thank God.
Irrelevant. We're only talking about your postings here.
Why is it tolerable for you to hear XYZ is a fraud over and over again from Wexler but you don't like my saying that XYX isn't a fraud?
The clear majority of Bill's posts here are not about GUMM. In fact the post you were attacking wasn't even about GUMM, it was about MKTY. All he did was make reference to his view on GUMM as a point of comparison.
The only problem I have with your responses is that they are quite frankly getting really, really boring. I just think you can do better for yourself by laying off the 24/7 vigil on GUMM references.
I knew the minute that I saw Wexler post on this thread that he would mention fraud and GUMM in the same sentence.
Funny, I see six straight posts from Bill that don't mention GUMM at all. That kind of kills your average.
Let's see, Wexler charges fraud. I say it's BS. Wexler charges fraud. I say it's BS
Yeah, yeah, lather, rinse, repeat. Maybe you could be proactive and break the cycle yourself? Ever consider that if you didn't jump every time Bill says "fraug", he might not do it so often? I'm sure Bill gets a kick out of it all, but I'm starting to feel sorry for you. That's why I'm trying to get you to take yourself off the hook.
Bill has already tripled his short position in GUMM. This is three times the full position that he originally thought he was going to take
Sigh. You've already forgotten what I just told you. I told you Bill starts with only a fraction of his intended final position, and what do you do, you turn right around and assume Bill started with a 100% position! Come on, Dan!
How many stocks can you triple your position in before you run out of money, especially when those positions are moving against you?
You really ought to try that spreadsheet idea out. Bill is down in relatively few positions. He's way up on ERTH, GBUR, BTX, COST, THQI, and even a little up on AOL, and that's not even close to a complete list.
Seriously, I can't suggest strongly enough that you put this thread behind you and move on. If Zicam goes on to be heralded as the product that brought legitimacy to homeopathic remedies in the eyes of the mainstream, and GUMM goes to 50 and 100 like you are so sure it will, then you can come back here and let us all have it. But if you leave now and six months or a year from now Zicam sales are reported as "disappointing" and GUMM goes to the low single digits, there's just the chance we might have forgotten by that time just how rude you've been all these months on this thread.
The choice is yours. I've said what I'm going to on this matter. |
