SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mgsam who wrote (2419)6/5/1996 12:31:00 AM
From: Joe Rizzo   of 58324
 
Mgsam, your bullish case is compelling--here is my rebuttal.

You mentioned that production constraints are old news. Yet the company said in its 6/3/96 press release that capacity for 1996 is only 5 million Zip drives. I believe the people that are assuming this company does $1.6 billion in revenue are estimating 8 million drives will be sold in the 3/97 year as stated incorrectly by the iomega product manager.

Notwithstanding the wonderful job Iomega has done promoting its product and stock, I just do not believe the stocks valuation should be $5.9 billion (143 mm shares x $41). Are the executives that hold options on close to 14 mm shares at $2 per share really worth $546 mm dollars. We'll see in sixty days when a lot of them try to cash in.

If the company encounters some competition or if sales slow, no cushing exists. Say the company only does $1.2 billion in sales--still 135% growth--and the stock market gets sloppy. What's the value of the stock then? 2x's revenue would yield a stock price of $17. Further if Iomega's products become more of a commodity 1 to 1.5 times revenue is more appropriate. Now on the other hand, if you are right, What's your upside? $5 billion in revenue three years from now with 13% net margins. (very optimistic) This yields $650 mm in net income. Shares o/s will probably be 160 mm. Since the company clearly will be more mature, a p/e of 15 or a price to revenue of 2xs seems fair to generous. Thus your best case in three years, in my opinion, is a)$60 to b)$62.50 per share. a)$4.06 net income times 15 or b) 2xs $5 billion \ 160 mm shares. Present value these projections and you get a best case current valuation of $50 per share--approximately where I shorted the stock.

You've probably heard all of this before from prior shorts, but remember other shorts were shorting a $1, $2, $3, or even $4 billion company. I shorted a company valued at $7 billion. Wayne Huisenga (sorry I am not a sports fan and probably misspelled his name) was asked on CNBC why he sold Blockbuster Video for $8.4 billion when its prospects were still so good. He stated that it is much easier to take a medium valued enterprise and turn it into a larger value then to take a large enterprise and turn it into a mega company.

I just believe the best case scenario is already in the stock. Thus, in most instances I win and in the others I lose some or break even.

Joe Rizzo
JMR Trading
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext