Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (74555)	10/7/1999 5:43:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) of 1573092

Elmer, <So you are saying the SpecFP95 scores improved from ~16 for a 600MHz PIII to ~25 for 600MHz CuMine without the use of SIMD instructions? That's a 56% improvement. Is that correct????> The foil said there was a 20% increase from a Pentium III 600B to 600EB. I assume that meant the 600B was also benefitting from cache-streaming instructions and the 820/RDRAM platform. By the way, one correction here. The scores are SPECint_base95 and SPECfp_base95. So to extrapolate numbers here: SPECint_base95 SPECfp_base95 -------------- ------------- PIII 600, no SSE 24.6 14.9 PIII 600B, w/ SSE 25.9 20.8 PIII 600EB, w/ SSE 29 25 (The PIII 600 numbers were taken from the Dell Precision Workstation 410. I don't know what the highest numbers should be for that processor.) Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next