Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC )

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: wily who wrote (9010)	10/7/1999 11:55:00 PM
From: Zardoz	Read Replies (3) of 14778

In Canada, Rogers cable modems have a maximium portal of 4 per channel. I've found that it's the T1 in this world which are cap'd, Between freinds I can recieve up to 3.4Mbps, with an average of 2.8Mbps. But to interface with netscape or microsoft I'm limited to 400Kbps. But of course my upload speed is capped to 50K/s. {but hey, I'm a leecher} Soon, thanks to the CRTC and deregulation. We can expect better service IF they expect to keep their service. Other companies like SHAW offer faster @home service, which is now symmetrical. So I think for $32CAD/mnth {$38 cause I have 2 IP's} I have a great service. Hutch PS: After Deinstallation of the @home software, I noticed a 250% increase in speed. My guess is they place a cap within their software. ADSL: Most areas that offer DSL, won't work. Reason: Bridge Taps. These are line multiplexors and will cause bandwidth over flow. So the sugnals {which are high frequecy} will degrade, and as such get lost. Unless you live VERY close to a switching station, you won't get ADSL to reach the min specs. BUT few who have ADSL even know how to test it. ADSL would've cost me $64, but the second IP wouldn't be needed. PPS: Sorry about the spelling...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next