Wheaton River Minerals (WRM Toronto) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Wheaton River Minerals (WRM Toronto)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Steve Johnston who wrote (214)	10/8/1999 9:46:00 AM
From: I_C_Deadpeople	Read Replies (1) of 350

I would have to read my file on Kit to be sure, but my recollection is that the benefits to the Kinross JV was obviously cash to possible production ( just over 2 miilion ounces now with potential for 3 million? )plus the experience in setting up/operating mines in the north. The road/port discussion has been ongoing for some time up there but I have no idea where that stands. I recall the pre-feasability study stated a POG of $325 or $340 to be bare min. economic. I do not recall the data on mine life or annual production.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next