SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan3 who wrote (74746)10/9/1999 1:34:00 PM
From: Goutam  Read Replies (2) of 1572953
 
Dan,

Copied from Aceshardware - aceshardware.com ________________________

Single CPU server benchmarks johan Saturday, October 16, 1999 (06:20 PM West-Europa (zomertijd))

A few days ago, I came across a very good processor test done by PC Professionell , the German Ziff Davies magazine. They tested several CPU's on their server capabilities. And the results were quite astonishing:

CPU ZD serverbench 4.1 ZD Netbench 6.0
============ ================== ===============
Athlon 600 41.9 64.18
Athlon 550 38.7 61.8
K6-III 500 35.1 54.1
XEON 500 32.5 50.1
PIII 550 32.3 43
Celeron 500 22.5 33.2

Now, the K6-III might not be an option for big companies, but small companies should really consider this"forgotten processor" for a small single CPU server. The K6-III slaps its brother the Athlon and the Intel CPU's silly on clock for clock and bang for buck basis ! Note that the K6-III had 2 MB L2-cache [L3?]. Internet and server applications seem to like the Tri-level cache structure of the K6-III.

aceshardware.com ________________________

Goutama
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext