SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Anthony@Pacific Member Vote
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: A@P Trader who wrote (922)10/10/1999 12:41:00 AM
From: LPS5  Read Replies (1) of 1638
 
No, no - THAT I believe. I certainly do.

Previously, the word "former" wasn't in there, which is very important. Active duty special ops personnel would not be permitted to pull "private duty" like that, and certainly not with operational weapons and uniforms.

But active duty cops, with badges and weapons? Sure, they do that all the time. I see the NYPD at all sorts of private affairs they're deemed to be required at.

I believe it 100%. No argument here.

LPS5
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News