SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company
QCOM 151.59-0.4%Jan 30 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Clarksterh who wrote (2203)10/11/1999 9:10:00 PM
From: DaveMG  Read Replies (1) of 13582
 
Yes Clark.. you might be right in both instances..

Qualcomm doesn't always announce new licensees

and

Other companies actually build most (all?) of their hardware, and especially if some of those vendors were already Q licensees we would be unlikely to see any announcement of W-CDMA licenses

I think I remember releases referring to NTT proprietary technology that will be involved in their network, implying that they're doing more than just "buying" equipment from existing licensees. I've been trying to log onto freeedgar for about 1/2 an hour to read the list of licensees without success, but aren't some carriers ie ATT and BAM licensees?

Any licensing moving in the direction of "WCDMA" would be viewed by the financial community as a significant event, and I'd imagine the new shareholder friendly QCOM would want to tell us about it. OTOH, as is apparent, Q has already opted to depoliticize the standards environment so perhaps a "no tell" attitude prevails. I noticed that today's release regarding 3G chipsets makes no mention of WCDMA, only DS mode, hardly an omission that would be made accidently. So we'll see.

In any event, firm evidence of WCDMA licensing would convince me that these networks will become reality sooner rather than later..

Nice to have you "hangin around"..

Dave
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext