SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Gilead Science (GILD) Followers
GILD 124.62-0.1%11:08 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (255)4/9/1997 2:58:00 AM
From: Doug Meetmer   of 961
 
The problem with treating Hep B is that the infection relapses after discontinuation of the suppressive drugs. In addition, it is one thing to show that LFTs improve on treatment, but a very different thing to show that on treatment a drug leads to fewer incidences of cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Those studies would take years to complete. Naturally, there is a supposition that degree of chronic active hep B disease activity correlates with chance of developing cirrhosis. I think it would be wonderful for a person with chronic active Hep b to take a suppressive drug and dramatically lower his lifetime chances for development of cirrhosis or HCC. On the other hand, we wouldn't want to give someone a drug to take longterm if the only outcome is improvement in liver function tests but no change in incidence of cirrhosis or HCC.

-DM
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext