3Com Corporation (COMS) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS)

COMS 0.00130

0.0%

Nov 7 11:47 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bux who wrote (35472)	10/14/1999 12:49:00 PM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (2) of 45548

Bux, In all due respect... I read the posts in sequence and respond to them in sequence. When I get to a post I wish to respond to... I do it then, sometimes unaware of the information in subsequent posts. I believe this is what occurred in this case. My post #35454 was in response to your post #35413 which preceded Mang's information in post #35415. In fact Mang's post was also in response to your post #35413. So the real question is what is your game? Perhaps my methodology is wrong but it's what works best for me. If your time is to "valuable" for this discussion I understand - simply don't respond and we'll move on. (Who's on the high horse now?) However, I can't help but feel that you are somehow upset that you were incorrect about other carrier CDMA deployments. It would appear to me that I'm the only one on this thread that admits my mistakes. You still have yet to admit that you were wrong about deployments and now have taken a heated approach towards our discussion even though I, at your request, have dismounted from "my high horse". I applaud the fact that you took a position regarding CDMA deployments. When taking a position one sometimes mistakes. This does happen - I can tell you from experience <vbg>. However adding information to the "collective" with the oft chance that you'll be challenged on facts is far better than simply waving ones hands in the air saying "ballistic" and not providing any real data. In one of your last posts you implied (which apparently Mehrdad supports - not sure that's helpful) that carriers will not deploy other CDMA technologies in their infrastructures if they are already using IWF. If you really believe that then simply say it. Then we can move on. If you'd like to continue to try to discredit me rather then address the issues on COMS and this investement that is your prerogative but I have no alterior motives as a few here would like to believe. This is not the X-files, this is not spy versus spy..this is investing. OG

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next