SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : BroadVision (BVSN)
BVSN 4.410-0.5%May 18 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elroy who wrote (2140)10/14/1999 3:21:00 PM
From: Wizard  Read Replies (1) of 3773
 
>>Hype is great, but do you still think new investors should buy this stock after a 130 point gain in the past year?

On extended weakness, BVSN should be purchased.

>>Do you think BVSN's position in the market today is 15x better than it was a year ago?

It was dramatically undervalued and it is making up for it so the position is X% better (unmeasurable) and the stock is up 15x. That doesn't really help in identifying its future worth though so I don't care to think about it more than that.

>>Do you really think BVSN is really ever going to sell $500 million in a single quarter??

That is a silly question because again, it has nothing to do with how BVSN stock has acted or will act in the future.

>>And why it it worth up to $12 billion? Can't answer that one, can you? All you can say at this point is that "BVSN is a good, well positioned company, therefore the stock should go higher".

I just think about valuation differently than you do. I think about valuation as one piece of the attractiveness of a security - you weight it more heavily. Valuation is important to me but valuation is less important if other metrics are in order. Broadvision possesses the characteristics of a great growth stock as far as I am concerned and it has acted like a great growth stock. Prove to me why it is not worth $4b or $12b.



Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext