SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sea_biscuit who wrote (8470)10/15/1999 9:21:00 PM
From: hmbsandman  Read Replies (2) of 12475
 
> Well, consider these -- Chinese technology transfers to
> Islamabad were restricted to short-range ballistic
> missiles.
> Even those missiles that were transferred were never
> allowed to be uncrated. Furthermore, persistent US
> pressure had put an end to Chinese inputs into
> Pakistan's nuclear weapons complex. And China also
> declined to extend a nuclear umbrella to Pakistan.

I find this difficult to believe. So you're saying
the Chinese transferred missiles to Pak but didn't
allow them even to be opened?! Hello?

To others: you might want to check out a book called
"Betrayal" by Bill Gertz which details how the Clinton
establishment allowed China to get away with practically
arming Pakistan to the teeth. Bill Gertz covers national
security for the Washington Times..IMO a more reliable
source than some nameless dippy dude.

Regards,
SC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News