SEDONA Corporation (SDNA) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : SEDONA Corporation (SDNA)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zvi Yammer who wrote (186)	4/9/1997 11:33:00 PM
From: Mike Heimbuch	of 731

Long time - No hear from you Mr. ZVI In all fairness to our continuing need for balanced dialogue - particularly in the absence of incontrovertible proof or even preponderance of evidence for the quasi criminal activity you attach to SCNG folks - it seems only reasonable that you would also urge that we read the next two posts following your post of - techstocks.com -if only to present another viewpoint. If not - then at least call the company - ask for their explanation of this late filing situation - If they tell you something that turns out to be a falsehood - then take legal action - and we will all support you. Why in the Sam Hell would any right thinking person stay invested in a company that they strongly or even remotely suspect of engaging in purposely deceitful behavior??? Keeping track of the truthfulness of company officials has merit - and no doubt many investors look at this to gauge their comfort. Perhaps this board just isn't big enough - but I have yet to see anybody here who will take on the job of defending the accounting methods or public relations of Scan Graphics - so any negative remarks about SCNG scamming us - just sit there like a cold McDonald's Big MAC at the bottom of your stomach. Not much you can do about it!! - except try to ignore it or throw up. Both leave you feeling uncomfortable. This is particularly why I believe that balancing out a negative statement with another point of view is so important. It adds a frame of reference which brings legitimacy to a debate - and often serves to give credence to the negative postion and the presenter - perhaps even well deserved credence!! It is my hope that this board will stay primarily focused on learning as much as possible about every aspect of the exciting GIS world that Sedona Geo is working in - and not about the fundamental moral caliber of the people who speak for Scan Graphics. Mike up North

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next