BRE-X (ANTI-BRE-X CONSPIRACY THEORIES) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : BRE-X (ANTI-BRE-X CONSPIRACY THEORIES)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mikesloan who wrote ()	4/10/1997 1:10:00 AM
From: Graystone	of 71

I have one. Let's say Bre-X pissed somebody off after the Busang I deposit was found. Busang I is likely similar to the Kelian Mine in geology and proved to be an excellent target for the conspirators. Control of Bre-X is the issue here. There is not likely the 71M ounces originally reported. Professional reuptations are at stake here, namely De Guzman vs "some faceless technician at FCX doing his job". The results from FCX have served their purpose, the money to take control of Bre-X had already been made with salted results and the resulting crash is the perfect opportunity to take control of the company by buying it in the open market (50,000,000 + shares). Bre_X management, a solid reputable team are all fired and the resulting company (worth about 3.50 - 4.00 share ) never does anything again. (but settle lawsuits)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next