Barrick Gold (ABX) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Barrick Gold (ABX)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ForYourEyesOnly who wrote (1403)	10/17/1999 10:03:00 AM
From: jack BROSS	Read Replies (4) of 3558

THANKS tora. EXCITEMENT i an NOT convinced that BARRICK is HEAVELY hedge one year from now is not dangerous, if they can buy reserves which cost less 100$ to produce gold, that is where the SECURITY IS. hedging 380$ IS NOT A BAD PRICE IF IT'S COST YOU 100 TO PRODUCE IT hedging 330 IS A BAD PRICE IF IT'S COST YOU 240 TO PRODUCE IT and that the gold price is at 360-380 . mr oliphant knows where he is going. mr murphey (gata) works in a way for building up the price of gold i maintain that smart hedging has PAID barrick shareholders. and bad hedginging has cut off the neck of some CO (cbj. ashanti etc) jack bross

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next