SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tony Viola who wrote (75721)10/17/1999 2:11:00 PM
From: DRBES  Read Replies (1) of 1572493
 
re: "I have seen Process Boy's posts, as recently as last night, and many other times from Intel people that their considered opinion was that copper was not necessary for top performance at 0.18. "

If I were intEL and I was suffering unexpected egregious delays in getting an advanced product out, like cuoNTIME, I certainly would try to take the "public" position that it was never supposed to have CU interconnects, despite its code name that beLIES this lie. I ask the non-rhetorical: "why did they not call it the 'alumininummine'"?

Regards

DARBES
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News