Discuss Year 2000 Issues Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim who wrote (8949)	10/17/1999 5:52:00 PM
From: bearcub	Read Replies (2) of 9818

and i don't appreciate you glossing over the nuclear disaster potential straight ahead and refusing to reply to my cogent and substantive reply, from your educated background and degreed nuclear physicist credentials previously posted on SI profile which i posted for all to read some time back! what have you to say about the current 'nuclear accident' in Japan that is wrecking havoc on so many lives? want to place any bets as to whether or not it will be revealed that is was a y2k test that caused this tremendously sick situation over there? your elitist positional utterances especially as regards y2k and nuclear issues, especially in the absolutely critical one, confirmed by the NRC as being accurate in every regard: no back up electric generators for operating the plutonium rod lifts to prevent core meltdown in event of y2k power disruption, if those posts coupled with this current one: Message 11520180 is not a display of eliteist arrogance, then you better ship me a new dictionary. you're going over the falls as well. and being the one to say i told you so at your watery graveside is not an event that brings joy to this old man's heart!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next