SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 33.83+0.6%11:50 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (90496)10/17/1999 10:38:00 PM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Alibi Paul,

MSI had a problem with some very early boards and corrected that problem. If you think that having to correct an error is such a travesty, then why didn't Intel fold after the Pentium FDIV error? MSI just fixed the boards - immediately. Intel first claimed their error was so unlikely that it didn't matter. Then they tried to have people install a software patch. Then they said they would replace the defective chips if you could prove that you were doing work that was likely to be impacted. Finally they bowed to the demands of their customers and replaced the defective chips.

Those few MSI boards sometimes needed a power cycle instead of a reset - they didn't corrupt data like the Pentiums (rare as that data corruption was - it was still a far more serious problem)

There is nothing there to cause MSI to delete all references to a shipping product - instead they can be proud of their immediate and quibble free response to the incident. Something else made them remove those pages from their web site - what do you think it was?

By the way, Intel's behavior upon learning of the camino problem was equally commendable - though they could have let the news out a little sooner.

Dan
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext